Image to cube map

See also: Converting cubemaps to fisheye. The source code implementing the projections below is only available on request for a small fee. It includes a demo application and an invitation to convert an image of your choice to verify the code does what you seek.

For more information please contact the author. Converting from cubemaps to cylindrical projections The following discusses the transformation of a cubic environment map 90 degree perspective projections onto the face of a cube into a cylindrical panoramic image. The motivation for this was the creation of cylindrical panoramic images from rendering software that didn't explicitly support panoramic creation. The software was scripted to create the 6 cubic images and this utility created the panoramic.

The names of the cubic maps are assumed to contain the letters 'f', 'l', 'r', 't', 'b', 'd' that indicate the face front,left,right,top,back,down. If a wide vertical field of view is required then perhaps one should be using spherical equirectangular projections, see later. This direction vector is then used within the texture mapped cubic geometry. The face of the cube it intersects needs to be found and then the pixel the ray passes through is determined intersection of the direction vector with the plane of the face.

Critical to obtaining good quality results is antialiasing, in this implementation a straightforward constant weighted supersampling is used.

image to cube map

Cylindrical panoramic 90 degrees Cylindrical panoramic 60 degrees Cylindrical panoramic degrees Notes The vertical aperture must be greater than 0 and less than degrees. The current implementation limits it to be between 1 and degrees. While not a requirement, the current implementation retains the height to width ratio of the output image to the same as the vertical aperture to horizontal aperture.

One can equally form the image textures for a top and bottom cap. The following is an example of such caps, in this case the vertical field of view is 90 degrees so the cylinder is cubic diameter of 2 and height of 2 units. It should be noted that a relatively high degree of tessellation is required for the cylindrical mesh if the linear approximations of the edges is not to create seam artefacts. Converting from cylindrical projections to cube maps August The following maps a cylindrical projection onto the 6 faces of a cube map.

In reality it takes any 2D image and treats it as it were a cylindrical projection, conceptually mapping the image onto a cylinder around the virtual camera and then projecting onto the cube faces.

Indeed, it was originally developed for taking famous painting and wrapping them around the viewer in a virtual reality environment. Key to whether the image represents an actual cylindrical panorama or an arbitrary image is the correct computation of the vertical field of view so as to minimise any apparent distortion.

If the following example the cylindrical panorama is exactly 90 degree vertical field of view, so in the cube maps the image extends to the midpoint of each f,r,l,b face. Converting to and from 6 cubic environment maps and a spherical projection Introduction There are two common methods of representing environment maps, cubic and spherical, the later also known as equirectangular projections. In cubic maps the virtual camera is surrounded by a cube the 6 faces of which have an appropriate texture map.

These texture maps are often created by imaging the scene with six 90 degree fov cameras giving a left, front, right, back, top, and bottom texture. In a spherical map the camera is surrounded by a sphere with a single spherically distorted texture.

HDRi images to Cube Maps Converter

This document describes software that converts 6 cubic maps into a single spherical map, the reverse is also developed. As an illustrative example the following 6 images are the textures placed on the cubic environment, they are arranged as an unfolded cube.

Below that is the spherical texture map that would give the same appearance if applied as a texture to a sphere about the camera. Spherical equirectangular projection Algorithm The conversion process involves two main stages.

The goal is to determine the best estimate of the colour at each pixel in the final spherical image given the 6 cubic texture images.

Subscribe to RSS

The first stage is to calculate the polar coordinates corresponding to each pixel in the spherical image. The second stage is to use the polar coordinates to form a vector and find which face and which pixel on that face the vector ray strikes. In reality this process is repeated a number of times at slightly different positions in each pixel in the spherical image and an average is used in order to avoid aliasing effects.

If the coordinates of the spherical image are i,j and the image has width "w" and height "h" then the normalised coordinates x,y each ranging from -1 to 1 are given by:. The polar coordinates theta and phi are derived from the normalised coordinates x,y below. Note there are two vertical relationships in common use, linear and spherical.

In the former phi is linearly related to y, in the later there is a sine relationship. The polar coordinates theta,phi are turned into a unit vector view ray from the camera as below.By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service. The dark mode beta is finally here. Change your preferences any time. Stack Overflow for Teams is a private, secure spot for you and your coworkers to find and share information.

I'm currently working on a simple 3D panorama viewer for a website. For mobile performance reasons I'm using the three. This requires a cube map, split up into 6 single images. I'm recording the images on the iPhone with the Google Photosphere app, or similar apps that create equirectangular panoramas. Preferrably, I'd like to do the conversion myselfeither on the fly in three.

I found Andrew Hazelden's Photoshop actions, and they seem kind of close, but no direct conversion is available. Is there a mathematical way to convert these, or some sort of script that does it? I'd like to avoid going through a 3D app like Blender, if possible. Maybe this is a long shot, but I thought I'd ask.

I have okay experience with javascript, but I'm pretty new to three. I'm also hesitant to rely on the WebGL functionality, since it seems either slow or buggy on mobile devices. Support is also still spotty. If you want to do it server side there are many options.

You could put the command to do this into a script and just run that each time you have a new image. Its hard to tell quite what algorithm is used in the program. We can try and reverse engineer quite what is happening by feeding a square grid into the program.

I've used a grid from wikipedia. Which gives This gives us a clue as to how the box is constructed. Imaging sphere with lines of latitude and longitude one it, and a cube surrounding it.

Now project from the point at center of the sphere produces a distorted grid on the cube. These will either project to one of the four sides the top or the bottom. Otherwise, it will be projected on the top or bottom and you will need a different projection for that. The projection function takes the theta and phi values and returns coordinates in a cube from -1 to 1 in each direction. The cubeToImg takes the x,y,z coords and translates them to the output image coords.In computer graphicscube mapping is a method of environment mapping that uses the six faces of a cube as the map shape.

The environment is projected onto the sides of a cube and stored as six square textures, or unfolded into six regions of a single texture. The cube map is generated by first rendering the scene six times from a viewpoint, with the views defined by a 90 degree view frustum representing each cube face.

In the majority of cases, cube mapping is preferred over the older method of sphere mapping because it eliminates many of the problems that are inherent in sphere mapping such as image distortion, viewpoint dependency, and computational inefficiency.

Also, cube mapping provides a much larger capacity to support real-time rendering of reflections relative to sphere mapping because the combination of inefficiency and viewpoint dependency severely limits the ability of sphere mapping to be applied when there is a consistently changing viewpoint. However, hardware limitations on the ability to access six texture images simultaneously made it infeasible to implement cube mapping without further technological developments.

This problem was remedied in with the release of the Nvidia GeForce Accelerated in hardware, cube environment mapping will free up the creativity of developers to use reflections and specular lighting effects to create interesting, immersive environments. Cube mapping is preferred over other methods of environment mapping because of its relative simplicity. Also, cube mapping produces results that are similar to those obtained by ray tracingbut is much more computationally efficient — the moderate reduction in quality is compensated for by large gains in efficiency.

Predating cube mapping, sphere mapping has many inherent flaws that made it impractical for most applications. Sphere mapping is view dependent meaning that a different texture is necessary for each viewpoint. Therefore, in applications where the viewpoint is mobile, it would be necessary to dynamically generate a new sphere mapping for each new viewpoint or, to pre-generate a mapping for every viewpoint.

Also, a texture mapped onto a sphere's surface must be stretched and compressed, and warping and distortion particularly along the edge of the sphere are a direct consequence of this.

Paraboloid mapping provides some improvement on the limitations of sphere mapping, however it requires two rendering passes in addition to special image warping operations and more involved computation. Conversely, cube mapping requires only a single render pass, and due to its simple nature, is very easy for developers to comprehend and generate. Also, cube mapping uses the entire resolution of the texture image, compared to sphere and paraboloid mappings, which also allows it to use lower resolution images to achieve the same quality.

Although handling the seams of the cube map is a problem, algorithms have been developed to handle seam behavior and result in a seamless reflection.

If a new object or new lighting is introduced into scene or if some object that is reflected in it is moving or changing in some manner, then the reflection changes and the cube map must be re-rendered. When the cube map is affixed to an object that moves through the scene then the cube map must also be re-rendered from that new position.

Computer-aided design CAD programs use specular highlights as visual cues to convey a sense of surface curvature when rendering 3D objects. However, many CAD programs exhibit problems in sampling specular highlights because the specular lighting computations are only performed at the vertices of the mesh used to represent the object, and interpolation is used to estimate lighting across the surface of the object. Problems occur when the mesh vertices are not dense enough, resulting in insufficient sampling of the specular lighting.


This in turn results in highlights with brightness proportionate to the distance from mesh vertices, ultimately compromising the visual cues that indicate curvature. Unfortunately, this problem cannot be solved simply by creating a denser mesh, as this can greatly reduce the efficiency of object rendering.Cube maps are typically used to create reflections from an environment that is considered to be infinitely far away.

But with a small amount of shader math, we can place objects inside a reflection environment of a specific size and location, providing higher quality, image-based lighting IBL. Cube-mapped reflections are now a standard part of real-time graphics, and they are key to the appearance of many models. Yet one aspect of such reflections defies realism: the reflection from a cube map always appears as if it's infinitely far away.

This limits the usefulness of cube maps for small, enclosed environments, unless we are willing to accept the expense of regenerating cube maps each time our models move relative to one another. See Figure Figure Typical "Infinite" Reflections. When moving models through an interior environment, it would be useful to have a cube map that behaved as if it were only a short distance away—say, as big as the current room. As our model moved within that room, the reflections would scale appropriately bigger or smaller, according to the model's location in the room.

image to cube map

Such an approach could be very powerful, grounding the viewer's sense of the solidity of our simulated set, especially in environments containing windows, video monitors, and other recognizable light sources. Figure Localized Reflections. Fortunately, such a localized reflection can be achieved with only a small amount of additional shader math.

Developers of some recent games, in fact, have managed to replace a lot of their localized lighting with such an approach. Let's look at Figure We see a reflective object a large gold mask in a fairly typical reflection-mapped environment. Figure Reflective Object with Localized Reflection. Now let's consider Figurea different frame from the same short animation.

The maps have not changed, but look at the differences in the reflection! The reflection of the window, which was previously small, is now large—and it lines up with the object. In fact, the mask slightly protrudes through the surface of the window, and the reflections of the texture-mapped window blinds line up precisely. Likewise, look for the reflected picture frame, now strongly evident in the new image. Figure Localized Reflection in a Different Location.

Panorama to cubemap - Grid to Equirectangular

At the same time, the green ceiling panels this photographic cube map shows the lobby of an NVIDIA buildingwhich were evident in the first frame, have now receded in the distance and cover only a small part of the reflection. This reflection can also be bump mapped, as shown in Figure only bump has been added. See the close-up of this same frame in Figure Figure Bump Applied to Localized Reflection. The illustration in Figure shows the complete simple scene.

The large cube is our model of the room the shading will be described later. The 3D transform of the room volume is passed to the shader on the reflective object, allowing us to create the correct distortions in the reflection directly in the pixel shader.

To create a localized frame of reference for lighting, we need to create a new coordinate system. In addition to the standard coordinate spaces such as eye space and object space, we need to create lighting space — locations relative to the cube map itself.

This new coordinate space will allow us to evaluate object locations relative to the finite dimensions of the cube map. To simplify the math, we'll assume a fixed "radius" of 1. In our example, we'll pass two float4x4 transforms to the vertex shader: the matrix of the lighting space relative to world coordinates and its inverse transpose.

Combined with the world and view transforms, we can express the surface coordinates in lighting space. We'll pass per-vertex normal, tangent, and binormal data from the CPU application, so that we can also bump map the localized reflection. The data we'll send to the pixel shader will contain values in both world and lighting coordinate systems.By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service.

The dark mode beta is finally here. Change your preferences any time. Stack Overflow for Teams is a private, secure spot for you and your coworkers to find and share information. Learn more. How to convert Panorama image to cube-map six faces images using objective c? Ask Question. Asked 1 year, 9 months ago. Active 1 year, 9 months ago. Viewed times. Here is Input image Convert to six different faces cub-map images.

Ravi Kotadiya Ravi Kotadiya 27 4 4 bronze badges. Active Oldest Votes. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown. The Overflow Blog. Podcast Cryptocurrency-Based Life Forms. Q2 Community Roadmap. Featured on Meta. Community and Moderator guidelines for escalating issues via new response….

Feedback on Q2 Community Roadmap. Triage needs to be fixed urgently, and users need to be notified upon…. Dark Mode Beta - help us root out low-contrast and un-converted bits.

image to cube map

Technical site integration observational experiment live on Stack Overflow. Related Hot Network Questions. Question feed. Stack Overflow works best with JavaScript enabled.I've been working a lot with Cube Maps lately. Also works if you append a 3D scene to it, you just need to change the baking from "environment" to "combined" in that case.

These maps can be obtained by using blender internal since a long time blender 2. Cube Maps support was added in Blender 2. You can download the. The HDRi used on the examples are from www. I made the car in the video. This time I only had one week to make it so, I apologize but, no wipers or any similar detail.

I'm an independent film-maker and generalist freelancer specialized in 3D animation and interactive virtual reality. I use Blender since as a student and, from until current date, as a professional freelancer on the interactive virtual reality industry.

To add a profile picture to your message, register your email address with Gravatar. To protect your email address, create an account on BlenderNation and log in when posting a message. Notify me of followup comments via e-mail.

You can also subscribe without commenting. You're blocking ads, which pay for BlenderNation. Read about other ways to support us. Rogper writes: Hey, I've been working a lot with Cube Maps lately. It as easy as this video explains:. You're awesome for sharing this. You're yet more awesome for the nice comment : Thanks!

This looks really handy, thanks!I am trying to understand the reasoning behind the image orientation for cubemap images displayed on a skybox. I found nothing helpful, mostly a lot of misinformation, in an internet-wide search. I found two very old posts in this forum which are on topic:. There are links in both to a.

There is also a link to an old opengl. So could someone please provide exact information as to the requirements and reasoning behind it. In the following descriptions my starting point is photographs of the scene matching the ground truth. What I have found is that, on OpenGL, images with the default bottom-up orientation have to be flipped vertically and all images have to be flipped horizontally - something most people never seem to have noticed.

Actually no flipping is necessary, you can just apply a scale of -1, -1, 1 to the uvw coordinates being passed in to the cube sampler. On Vulkan images with a top-down orientation need to be flipped or a -1 scale applied to the y coord.

You have to swap the posy and negy images in the cubemap for this to work. But I am completely failing to understand why it was designed this way. All the OpenGL samples I have looked at in the wild load the cubemap from individual. Since these formats have a top down orientation the samples just work. Except for the left-right issue. I have found Vulkan samples using ktx files with posy and negy swapped whose images have a bottom up orientation mislabelled as having top down so they seem to just work without any scaling of the uvw coords.

What I am really seeking is a way to load the exact same cubemap texture from a. How can I achieve this. The requirements for cubemap images are specified quite exactly in the OpenGL standard.

The reasoning for using these orientations is apparently that this is how Renderman did it. A KTX file just contains a bunch of image data. How was that image data created? Was the tool which generated it used correctly, or was it misconfigured? For each of the 6 images, you should know which face you want it to go onto, what the orientation in texture space is relative to the destination cube space, and so forth.

It means I have 6. The files are correctly identified as posx, negx, posy, negy and posz w. I am making the. I know exactly what is in them. If I create a ktx file containing a cubemap with the 6 images all having a lower left orientation then the rendering of the skybox my scene background is upside down and flipped left to right. I am trying to understand the reasoning to see if I am missing something and in the hope that properly understanding it will help me find a solution to rendering the same.

Cubemaps are in a left-handed coordinate system. I posted about this on Facebook about 6 months ago. I just made the post public in case it is helpful to anybody. The tl;dr is that the image layout came from RenderMan, which has a left handed coordinate system and whose image coordinates have an upper-left origin. With those two things, the cube map layout is much more intuitive. Thanks cass.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *